December 16th, 2009 — insurance
Medical are constantly going up every year, and if you don’t want or have the money to spend on costly healthcare services, here are some useful tips to make your expenses much lower.
1. Prevent problems before they arise
The most effective way to keep your medical costs low is to prevent any health problems from developing. Exercise regularly, maintain a healthy weight, stop smoking, follow a diet, and run through regular medical checks at your doctor’s office. It all may sound simple, but the healthier you are the lower it will cost you to visit a doctor or get insurance.
2. Comparison shop when buying insurance
In case your employer doesn’t provide group insurance plans, you will benefit from individual insurance plans. But when shopping for insurance you will definitely notice how the rates differ from one company to another. Take it as an advantage and shop around, getting quotes from as many insurance providers as possible. This way you will find the most competitive offers that will help you save money. In case you are generally quite healthy and want to be insured only from serious illnesses or accidents, you will find more use from catastrophic insurance coverage.
3. Save money on prescription drugs
The most convenient way to cut costs on prescription drugs is getting them by mail in a several-month quantity either from pharmacies or online drugstores. This will cost you considerably less than buying from your local drugstore directly. In case your plan is a bit strict on the source of medications, you should ask your doctor about cheaper generic variations of the drug you’re prescribed whenever possible. Senior people and families with low-income can also contact pharmaceutical companies for direct assistance.
4. Sign with your spouse’s insurance plan
In many cases married people have two separate policies either provided by their employers or on an individual basis. And in most cases it’s not the best thing to have cost-wise. Analyze both of your policies to learn which one has better coverage and rates, and sign with the better one. Most insurance policies allow you to include your spouse so make sure to consult with your insurance company representative about that. Continue reading →
December 4th, 2009 — Health Insurance, insurance
One of the tried-and-tested ways of catching your attention is to announce that something is “cheap”. The trouble with this word is that it changes its meaning. Our experience tells us you get what you pay for. So, if you only pay a low price that usually means you get low quality. Although luck may be on your side and you find an inexpensive bargain, more often than not the result is bad value for money. Borrowing an example from across the pond, there once was an entrepreneur called Gerald Ratner who sold cheap jewelry. In 1991, he made a speech in which he spoke the literal truth, intending no more than a humorous take on what should have been obvious to anyone. Talking about some sherry glasses and a decanter for sale in his stores, he asked the question, “How can you sell this for such a low price?” and answered it, “Because it’s total crap.” He also described some earrings as, “…cheaper than a prawn sandwich”. The following day, £500 million was wiped off the stock market valuation and his company was forced into bankruptcy. It does not do to speak the truth about the real value of your products. You must always allow your customers to deceive themselves into buying what you offer.
Today, conventional wisdom says you can find cheap insurance online. These words are intended to encourage you to look at what’s on offer. There is, of course, never any obligation to buy. But, if no-one looks, there is no chance for the insurance company to make a sale. The marketers have to say something to provoke you into looking. So, when you see the word “cheap” applied to policies for sale through a website operated by a single insurer, read on with caution. This is an old sales technique and it fools only those who never shop around and find out what the competition quotes. Continue reading →
December 4th, 2009 — auto insurance, insurance
It’s one of those sad facts of life that ageing is inevitable. Being philosophical about it – it’s going to happen so you might as well celebrate it. The question is how society should celebrate ageing. People who rely on driving to get them around while working, continue to need their vehicles when they retire. Let’s face it. In most US towns and cities, few people walk. Everyone drives. Fifty years ago, not many seniors drove around because life expectancy was a lot lower than it is today. Now more people own cars and, with more leisure time and better health, go out and about on the roads. This creates an interesting dilemma for states. Let’s take Massachusetts as an example. Back in 1977, the legislature decided to grant seniors a reward for living so long. Regardless of their driving records, everyone over the age of 65 was given a 25% discount on their insurance premiums. This encouraged the car culture. Seniors were thought safer drivers, so it was alright to let them drive rather than walk around. The price tab was picked up by all the other drivers. The cost of the discount was spread across the premiums for all the other insured groups.
So how has this worked out? All the statistics from 1977 to date prove the initial assumption. Drivers in the age range 65 to 74 have fewer accidents than any other group on the road. This is due to three factors: they tend to drive more slowly, they have more experience than everyone else and they tend to drive at off-peak times when the danger is less. Thus, that group deserves a discount. Whether it should be 25% is not the point. There is considerable social benefit in continuing to encourage mobility among seniors. They go out and spend money in the community. They stay fit and healthy and are less of a burden on the health care services. But drivers aged 75 and over lose their edge. The body is slowing down. Reflexes and eyesight are not what they were. Their claims record is second only to the age group up to 25. This is sparking a debate about whether the discount should be removed for the oldest drivers. Continue reading →